Several people mailed me, stating the phpWatermark doesn’t work for them, though they followed all instructions.
Well probably I should have stated more clearly (or at all?) that phpWatermark requires libgd support in your installation of php.

But this problems arises some questions for me, concerning the most needed advancements in phpWatermark. Currently I see three ways which could be followed for the next releases:

  • Better checking for required functions
  • imageMagick support (will also require netpbm or giflib)
  • Support for embedding images as a watermark (like company logos etc.)

This article contains a poll and I would really like you to vote for your most wanted next devel goal.
Thanks for using phpWatermark!